| file under: vision of hope, transition, economic development, common sense | 11 Oct 2007 4:57 PM |
| What's All The Killing About? (may not be suitable for people of a human persuasion) | Posted by Nissim Dahan |
Please take the time to look at some of the numbers.
1 | 40,000,000 | Red China, 1949-76 (outright killing, manmade famine, Gulag) |
2 | 10,000,000 | Soviet Bloc: late Stalinism, 1950-53; post-Stalinism, to 1987 (mostly Gulag) |
3 | 4,000,000 | Ethiopia, 1962-92: Communists, artificial hunger, genocides |
4 | 3,800,000 | Zaire (Congo-Kinshasa): 1967-68; 1977-78; 1992-95; 1998-present |
5 | 2,800,000 | Korean war, 1950-53 |
6 | 1,900,000 | Sudan, 1955-72; 1983-2006 (civil wars, genocides) |
7 | 1,870,000 | Cambodia: Khmer Rouge 1975-79; civil war 1978-91 |
8 | 1,800,000 | Vietnam War, 1954-75 |
9 | 1,800,000 | Afghanistan: Soviet and internecine killings, Taliban 1980-2001 |
10 | 1,250,000 | West Pakistan massacres in East Pakistan (Bangladesh 1971) |
11 | 1,100,000 | Nigeria, 1966-79 (Biafra); 1993-present |
12 | 1,100,000 | Mozambique, 1964-70 (30,000) + after retreat of Portugal 1976-92 |
13 | 1,000,000 | Iran-Iraq-War, 1980-88 |
14 | 900,000 | Rwanda genocide, 1994 |
15 | 875,000 | Algeria: against France 1954-62 (675,000); between Islamists and the government 1991-2006 (200,000) |
16 | 850,000 | Uganda, 1971-79; 1981-85; 1994-present |
17 | 650,000 | Indonesia: Marxists 1965-66 (450,000); East Timor, Papua, Aceh etc, 1969-present (200,000) |
18 | 580,000 | Angola: war against Portugal 1961-72 (80,000); after Portugal's retreat (1972-2002) |
19 | 500,000 | Brazil against its Indians, up to 1999 |
20 | 430,000 | Vietnam, after the war ended in 1975 (own people; boat refugees) |
21 | 400,000 | Indochina: against France, 1945-54 |
22 | 400,000 | Burundi, 1959-present (Tutsi/Hutu) |
23 | 400,000 | Somalia, 1991-present |
24 | 400,000 | North Korea up to 2006 (own people) |
25 | 300,000 | Kurds in Iraq, Iran, Turkey, 1980s-1990s |
26 | 300,000 | Iraq, 1970-2003 (Saddam against minorities) |
27 | 240,000 | Columbia, 1946-58; 1964-present |
28 | 200,000 | Yugoslavia, Tito regime, 1944-80 |
29 | 200,000 | Guatemala, 1960-96 |
30 | 190,000 | Laos, 1975-90 |
31 | 175,000 | Serbia against Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, 1991-1999 |
32 | 150,000 | Romania, 1949-99 (own people) |
33 | 150,000 | Liberia, 1989-97 |
34 | 140,000 | Russia against Chechnya, 1994-present |
35 | 150,000 | Lebanon civil war, 1975-90 |
36 | 140,000 | Kuwait War, 1990-91 |
37 | 130,000 | Philippines: 1946-54 (10,000); 1972-present (120,000) |
38 | 130,000 | Burma/Myanmar, 1948-present |
39 | 100,000 | North Yemen, 1962-70 |
40 | 100,000 | Sierra Leone, 1991-present |
41 | 100,000 | Albania, 1945-91 (own people) |
42 | 80,000 | Iran, 1978-79 (revolution) |
43 | 75,000 | Iraq, 2003-present (domestic) |
44 | 75,000 | El Salvador, 1975-92 |
45 | 70,000 | Eritrea against Ethiopia, 1998-2000 |
46 | 68,000 | Sri Lanka, 1997-present |
47 | 60,000 | Zimbabwe, 1966-79; 1980-present |
48 | 60,000 | Nicaragua, 1972-91 (Marxists/natives etc,) |
49 | 51,000 | Arab-Israeli conflict 1950-present |
50 | 50,000 | North Vietnam, 1954-75 (own people) |
51 | 50,000 | Tajikistan, 1992-96 (secularists against Islamists) |
52 | 50,000 | Equatorial Guinea, 1969-79 |
53 | 50,000 | Peru, 1980-2000 |
54 | 50,000 | Guinea, 1958-84 |
55 | 40,000 | Chad, 1982-90 |
56 | 30,000 | Bulgaria, 1948-89 (own people) |
57 | 30,000 | Rhodesia, 1972-79 |
58 | 30,000 | Argentina, 1976-83 (own people) |
59 | 27,000 | Hungary, 1948-89 (own people) |
60 | 26,000 | Kashmir independence, 1989-present |
61 | 25,000 | Jordan government vs. Palestinians, 1970-71 (Black September) |
62 | 22,000 | Poland, 1948-89 (own people) |
63 | 20,000 | Syria, 1982 (against Islamists in Hama) |
64 | 20,000 | Chinese-Vietnamese war, 1979 |
65 | 19,000 | Morocco: war against France, 1953-56 (3,000) and in Western Sahara, 1975-present (16,000) |
66 | 18,000 | Congo Republic, 1997-99 |
67 | 10,000 | South Yemen, 1986 (civil war) |
*All figures rounded. Sources: Brzezinski, Z., Out of Control: Global Turmoil on the Eve of the Twenty-first Century, 1993; Courtois, S., Le Livre Noir du Communism, 1997; Heinsohn, G., Lexikon der Völkermorde, 1999, 2nd ed.; Heinsohn, G., Söhne und Weltmacht, 2006, 8th ed.; Rummel. R., Death by Government, 1994; Small, M. and Singer, J.D., Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars 1816-1980, 1982; White, M., "Death Tolls for the Major Wars and Atrocities of the Twentieth Century," 2003.
___________
Incredibly, since 1950, about 85,000,000 people have been killed in bloody conflicts around the world. And that doesn't even include World War I and World War II.
I have often said that more people have probably been killed, by the hand of man, in the last 200 years, than the previous 2,000,000 years of human existence. It turns out, as dramatized in the film The Rise of Man, on the Discovery Channel, that cavemen, who lived during the 2,000,000 years before the advent of "civilization," were actually quite nice to one another. As hunter gatherers, there was no real reason to kill. Would you kill your neighbor just to steal a couple of peanuts? Why bother? Common sense told them to be good, and to help one another out, and they did.
In most instances, we demonstrate a certain sense of arrogance when we kill one another, an excessive sense of pride, and an extreme confidence in the validity of our convictions. When we kill, it is as if we cry out, for the world to hear, "We are right, and you will pay with your lives for the inadequacies of your beliefs." It is sheer arrogance to kill one another so casually, even in the name of our deeply held beliefs. Look at it this way-if we were indeed created by God in His image, then when we kill one another, aren't we, in effect, spitting at God's face?
To my mind, for what it's worth, there are only two reasons to kill: either someone is coming at you with an ax, or he's coming at your buddy with an ax. That's it; self-defense and the defense of others. No other reason to kill: not for our religion, not for our deeply held beliefs, not for politics, not for geopolitical considerations, not for the accumulation of wealth, not because we resent how someone thinks, or how he looks, or what he feels about us. Not for nothing. No other reason to kill.
Weapon systems are so advanced nowadays, that we would soon be able to kill one another in such magnitude, that previous death tolls would pale by comparison. Some of the bombs we have today are hundreds of times more powerful than the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs. We could literally wipe ourselves off the face of the earth.
Countries that are beginning to compete for scarce resources, like oil or fresh drinking water, could find themselves embroiled in a whole host of new conflicts, in the years to come. A global economy is a competitive economy, in which poor nations could easily find themselves on the losing end of the stick. But unlike previous times in history, when mostly everyone was poor, now there will be some who enjoy the prosperity that comes with economic growth, while a great many will be left behind, only to bear witness to their sense of deprivation and loss, and to their desperate struggle to survive.
The global economy offers promise for the future, but some pitfalls as well, as is often the case with new developments. The trick will be to sustain economic growth for ourselves, while allowing everyone on earth a place at the table, a stake in his or her future. Yes we will compete with one another, but we will invest in one another, as well. Yes we will work to augment our prosperity, but we will work for the prosperity of others, as well. Yes we will compete for scarce resources, but we will challenge one another to protect the environment, as well. Yes we will hold on to our deeply held beliefs, but we will find ways to talk to one another with common sense and with a sense of personal dignity, as well.
The secret to world peace, in contrast to the bloody history of the past, is not a secret at all. We have to find a way to connect, and to connect so cohesively, that we come to depend on one another. As such, it will be in our mutual best interest to keep the peace. By helping others, we help ourselves. Granted, it is a tall order, but it is probably the only way. Connect ideologically. Connect economically. Inspire in each other a sense of hope. And let the hope sustain the peace throughout the generations.



