| file under: vision of hope, Middle East Peace, human rights, Demonstrations | 26 Jan 2011 4:00 PM |
| Where Will The Rage Take Us? | Posted by Nissim Dahan |
Several possibilities come to mind. The regimes could intensify their response, with violence, and the people on the streets might back down. We've seen this scenario play out time and time again. Alternatively, the government could back down, only to be replaced by new political leaders who resort to the oppressive agendas of the past, in the name of restoring a sense of order. And finally, ideological extremists could sense a power vacuum in the making, and could seize the opportunity to bring about regime change. Such an outcome could easily bring back the oppression, but this time in the guise or religious fanaticism. All these various outcomes would be bad, because they do not adequately address the needs and aspirations of the people.
If we want our rage to count, we have no choice but to focus like a laser beam on what it is we want; and to figure out how we're going to get there. Suppose, for example, we agree on a Vision of Hope for the Middle East, a vision of Peace, Prosperity, and Freedom. These three things, Peace, Prosperity, and Freedom, depend on one another, like the three legs of a three-legged table, each leg supporting the other two, and all three supporting a Vision of Hope:
- Peace supports Prosperity and Freedom because you must stop the violence to grow the economy, and to institute democratic reforms.
- Prosperity supports Peace and Freedom because people need to believe that their sacrifices on behalf of peace and democracy will eventually lead to a better economic future.
- Freedom supports Peace and Prosperity because people will elect leaders who have the political mandates to make the painful concessions for peace, and to institute economic reforms.
Now here's the tricky part. How could we go about realizing a vision of Peace, Prosperity and Freedom? The trick is to find a mechanism that seems non-threatening on its face, but which is calculated to bring about positive change. That way, it may be possible to effectuate change, without having the existing regimes over-react, and without bringing to the fore new oppressors in the making, such as the ideological extremists. My best guess is that business is the key. Business is ideologically neutral. Business can create a neutral pathway to peace. Business creates its own ideological imperative. Once people are making money together, they are much less likely to go at each other's throats. Business can create good paying jobs and the prosperity that results. And finally, once people begin to make a decent living, and once they come to enjoy more peaceful relations with their neighbors, then eventually, the personal freedoms of the individual come to be respected and even protected by the powers that be. Human rights and personal freedoms go hand-in-hand with economic development.
It is difficult to say with certainty that an approach of this sort will work. But it is definitely worth trying, if for no other reason than all the failed attempts that came before. Take China as an example. China is still a dictatorship, there is no doubt. And human rights continue to remain an illusive dream. However, as a strong and vibrant middle class begins to take root, and as people's standard of living begins to improve, there is every reason to believe that the rights and freedoms of the individual will grow in stature, and that the government will eventually have no choice but to accommodate this new reality.
Since economic development is at the heart of what needs to be done in the Middle East, I believe that it would be good to put together a group of top business leaders who will work behind the scenes to promote the peace, and to revitalize the entire region with good paying jobs: jobs which grow our economies, jobs which protect the environment, and jobs which help to weaken the hold of extremist thinking, wherever such thinking is to be found. Eventually, if the stars align just right, and granted it's a big "if," I see the possibility of using a mosaic of mutual self-interest in the Middle East, to create a strategic/economic alliance between the Arab states, Israel, and the U.S., which would usher in the peace, and revitalize the region. It may seem a bit far fetched, given all the turmoil that is brewing even as we speak. But it is precisely the turmoil which may one day give birth to the dream.
Please join us at http://www.sellingavisionofhope.org/

written by GABE1, February 13, 2011
written by GABE1, February 15, 2011
They refused their own country in 1947 and than in 1967 as well as in 2000. Now we see the sheer stupidity in failing to negotiate just to score points on the settlement issue as well as with the UN and having recognition. But that was already tried in 1988 by Arafat(mhrin) without getting a state. But instead of living in peace and prosperity they are instead willing to stick it and kill Jews. Why and I am surprised to see that your optimism has not waned as my has been killed a long time ago with the blowing up buses and most recently the Qassams.
I would like peace but will not sacrifice even one Jew for it. When they are ready let them come.
written by GABE1, February 15, 2011
written by GABE1, February 15, 2011
In 1993 after Oslo Peres said something similar-"A New Middle East"
Well the Middle East has not changed and only the Sinai, Judea and Samaria and the Golan have kept the pot from completely boiling over.
We are being encircled- Hizbulla in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza and with time in all of Judea and Samaria (if allowed), Jordan being swallowed by Palestinians and Hamas and only with time will we find Egypt going Muslim Brotherhood.
The Middle East is becoming a radicalized Islamist neighborhood.
Sorry, but I see no silver lining. I would like to but I just don't as my worst fears are becoming reality. Only land buffer zones can do that. I do not trust paper that can be used as toilet paper at a time of Arab choosing.
written by GABE1, February 16, 2011
According to them we Jews have no right to be in the Middle East as a people or as a country. That silver lining of yours will just speed up the extinction of Israel.
written by GABE1, February 17, 2011
You are right Sussan. Sadly, the Palestinian voice is denied by people who should no better.
Why do some say it is ok to champion the violence of Menachem Begin and Irgun or Lehi, including the assassination of the UN Special Representative Count Folke Bernadotte, the killing of 91 at the King David Hotel Bombing, the assassination of Lord Moyne, the killing of the more than 100 civilians in Deir Yassin.
Yes, we can acknowledge the violence directed against the Jewish community on Palestine in 1921, 1929, 1936-1939. But the violence is understood in the context that Palestinians Arabs were militarily occupied by the British which was cemented by the League of Nations, despite objections of the Palestinian Arabs.
Sussan, the tragedy of this conflict is the failure of us as a collective to empathise with the other. Rightfully so we as a collective empathise with the plight of the Jewish community given millenia of persecution and discrimination. But how is it that some people find it so hard to empathise with Palestinians? or worse still actively try to deny or deligitimise the existence of Palestinians. It is not that hard to emapthise with the plight of Palestinians. Why cannot they walk in the shoes of another? Perhaps they will find the shoes are not so different to their own?
Thanks again Sussan.
written by GABE1, February 17, 2011
Reply by Sussan 1 day ago
Jews always expect everyone to empathize with their plight in WW2. (60 holocaust museums)
The time is long overdue for Israelis to open their eyes and see what they have done to the Palestinians.
Palestinians are the most maligned group in the world, and you Tony, do your bit to keep it this way.
Without Zionism, Palestine would now be a prosperous Arab country with a wonderful tourist industry. This was Palestine's birthright, stolen by the Zionists.
Instead, Palestinians live in poverty and are blamed for every problem Israel experiences.
written by GABE1, February 17, 2011
Israel must stop the terror, the apartheid, the racial superiority state. End the political ans economic slavery, full stop. You are oppressors. Israel has no clue about its oppression and what it's doing is immoral. BASIL KEILANI
written by GABE1, February 17, 2011
STOP LYING TO YOURSELF.
BTW. My wife was thrown out of Egypt in 1949. She lived in Cairo in the Sakhanin quarters.



As a accountant and somewhat knowledgeable in the field of economics, I am well aware that you cannot yield water from a stone. Taking it a bit further I cannot foresee any Arab regime, no matter its stripe, being able to create jobs for its ever expanding population where the biggest industry is "oil" with few manufacturing or agricultural enterprises. The ones that do exist are on a small scale and very primitive.
I am not sure but would surmise that your construction business took quite a hit in the USA and that happens to be in a well off country.I am also sure that prices in the USA as in Canada for food and oil have gone through the roof. Poverty has increased and only the social network has been able to prevent a catastrophe.
No different than in the Arab countries save and except the social support system through the government.
So, I am quite interested in your take on how "democracy" and freedom" will create jobs and or better the lives of the population. WHERE IS THE MONEY GOING TO COME FROM?
It is odd that a fruit vendor immolated himself and caused such an uproar or the an intifada was started with a car accident.
Only an overhole of the Arab mentality and its reliance on the religious mantra and embracing of modernity can the Arab world be saved. Oil is running out and in the absence of a change and based on Jihadist sentiment , we may not survive Islam.